Revision to Learning Context

After completing this assignment, reading others’ posts, and trying to isolate exactly what I am designing, I’ve decided to change my model from the discrepancy model to the innovation model.  So, with that said, here is my new plan:

First, I need to determine the nature of innovation.  In this case, it is a tool, specifically, Macbook Pros.  This innovation will affect learners in that it will allow them to achieve the following goals for this project:

  1. Learners will be able to produce clear and coherent analysis based on the prompt they choose in which the development, organization, and style are appropriate to task of creating a digital story using iMovie and clearly reflect understanding of the novel.
  2. Learners will be able to use iMovie to produce and publish auditory analysis, textual evidence, and graphics that communicate a clear understanding of the novel.
  3. Learners will be able to draw evidence from the novel to support their analysis, reflection, and connection to the novel, and demonstrate the evidence through their theme, storyboard, text, and graphics in iMovie.

This innovation will enhance learning and heighten engagement while aligning to established goals and common core standards because this technology adds new dimensions for learners by adding graphics, video, sound, and text in the creation of a movie clip.  In other words, this innovation is interactive, thus it enriches learning.  Resources will be provided and differentiated for learners.

The questions will be modified from my previous post and focus solely on the learners in terms of their experience with the new technology.

The learning environment is the same as my initial post.

Learning Context Analysis/Needs Analysis

1.  In Chapter 3, Smith and Ragan talk about two major components in the analysis of the learning context: (1) determining instructional needs and (2) describing the learning environment. Please identify the needs assessment condition your ID project falls into (See S&R p.44 for details). And discuss the steps you will take to conduct the needs assessment for your ID project. 

The needs assessment condition of my project (after 2 hours of instruction, high school juniors will be able to create a 2-4 minute digital story as a reflection of their understanding of the novel, Huckleberry Finn using iMovie and present it to their peers) falls into the Discrepancy Model because it is based on a gap between what learners should be able to do and what they are currently able to do.  The first step I need to take to conduct the needs assessment for my ID project is to list the learning goals.  The following are the learning goals for this project:

  1. Learners will be able to produce clear and coherent analysis based on the prompt they choose in which the development, organization, and style are appropriate to task and clearly reflect understanding of the novel.
  2. Learners will be able to use iMovie to produce and publish auditory analysis, textual evidence, and graphics that communicate a clear understanding of the novel.
  3. Learners will be able to draw evidence from the novel to support their analysis, reflection, and connection to the novel.

The next step is that I need to assess how well the learners are already reaching these goals and identify where the gaps are.  According to Smith and Ragan (2005), there are several ways in which to determine this, whether it is through observations, tests, self-assessments, or a combination of determinants.  Because school is not in session, I need to be creative here.  I know that I can collaborate with my co-workers via e-mail at the sophomore, junior, and senior levels, and together we can determine “what is and what should be” as stated in the third step of the Discrepancy Model.  One aspect of this step that really stood out to me was to be careful to assume that the learners do not know or haven’t had instruction on something.  This is where the vertical collaboration will perhaps benefit the ID the most.

Next, I will need to prioritize goals based on the gaps that we determine exist.  In the bulleted list of gaps provided by Smith and Ragan (47-48), I believe, from my experience with this age level, at least two of the gaps will need to be addressed.  For example, I think I will need to design this project based on closing a gap that affects the largest number of students first, though I do not want to jump to this conclusion until I am able to collaborate with my co-workers.

Finally, the Discrepancy Model requires that I determine which gaps are instructional and which are not.  This step echoed Dr. Rieber’s Youtube video, “Introduction to Needs Assessment” in that he stated, “Instruction solutions can only solve instructional problems.  In other words, adding more instruction doesn’t work all the time because  instruction isn’t always the solution to performance problems. Therefore, I will want to collaborate with my co-workers on this so that I do not fall into that particular design trap.

         2.  Briefly describe the learning environment where your ID project situates. 

      The learning environment is a student-centered environment where students sit at tables in groups of about 5-6.  The class size is 25-27.  A typical teacher using this ID has knowledge of using a Mac and is familiar with iMovie; however, step-by-step instructions will be provided via both video and text.  Students have some prior knowledge of iMovie, but this will vary, and may be addressed as a gap, depending on what is determined during collaboration.  The laptop ratio is 1-1; the teacher’s computer is connected to a projector that will display not only the step-by-step instructions, but will also have a student example to view. In addition, the laptops can be plugged into the projector for easy viewing when sharing. This high school seeks to integrate technology to support understanding and expertise because it appeals to multiple learners, and the administration supports a constructivism approach in that this ID will also reflect the 5-E Model.

     3.  In Chapter 4, Smith and Ragan discuss different characteristics of learners and how these characteristics can influence the design of the instruction. What learner characteristics are important to assess in the context of your ID project? What are some questions you plan to ask to obtain the information from you learners?

Through collaboration, I hope to identify prior knowledge of story-telling and technology use to assist learners, but this ID will have to go a bit further to identify the characteristics of the learners.  Because the targeted students are 16-17 years old, the motivation for this project will stem from not only using engaging technology to support understanding, but also a differentiated learning approach that allows students to choose from several prompts to complete this project.  The prompts that I have created so far are listed below:

1.  Narrate a personal experience that mirrors an event in the novel.

2.  Explore racism in Meridian, Idaho and compare/contrast it with the novel

3.  Teach satire in and use examples from the novel to enhance understanding.

4.  Explore superstition in society today and compare it to the novel.

5.  Compare/contrast and historical event in the novel and today’s society.

In addition, Affective Characteristics, including anxiety level and beliefs as well as Social Characteristics, including racial/ethnic backgrounds and relationships to peers (since this project is intended to be shared) will need to be considered, and modifications can easily be built into the ID if deemed necessary.   If I could survey students, I would include something similar to the following survey:

http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=qvhlntygc0olfi371756

This survey is just preliminary, but it is a start, and I feel like I am getting a grasp on this, which leads me to my initial reflection on module #2.

Initial Reflection:  This is a difficult process for me.  I have to keep reminding myself that for this particular project, I have to assume a role of an instructional designer; I am not the one delivering the instruction even though I am using my high school, my classroom, and literally, my students.   That is not to say that I won’t use this project!!!  I guess what I am saying is that it is difficult to be objective!  To be honest, I didn’t realize how much front-end analysis was necessary to begin an ID.

Thanks everyone!

Cynthia

Instructional Design Initial thoughts

1.  What do you think the word “design” implies? What does “instructional design” means to you? How does the meaning change when adding the word “systematic” in front of “instructional design?”

When I think of what the word “design” implies in terms of my students, my curriculum and my experience with instructional design strategies, including the Backwards Assessment Model, I think of the words of author, Garth Stein, “That which you manifest is before you.”  In other words, to begin with the end in mind (that which I manifest) gives me a clear understanding of what my overarching goals are for my students based on their individual backgrounds, needs, learning styles, and communication skills. Furthermore, I envision what I want my students to know and be able to do, create goals and objectives based on the end result in the forefront of my mind, create formative and summative assessments to meet the enduring understandings that align with the common core standards, and then strategize or design my instruction and engaging activities. This entire process is my perception of instructional design, and applying the word systematic to instructional design enhances the legitimacy of the process because it implies that the process is methodical and consistent.

As I read The Survey of Instructional Development Models, by Kent L. Gustafson and Robert Maribe Branch (2002), I found that my philosophy of instructional design aligned closely with the 5 activities in the ADDIE Model.  I was enlightened by the fact that ID’s visually communicate by illustrating the procedures to students in order to achieve desired outcomes.  Overall, I definitely can enhance my instruction using this knowledge and applying different models depending on my goals and my students’ needs.

2.  Share your own experiences to illustrate your point(s) above. When you share your experiences, be sure to describe the process you use to design or create learning experiences for others. It does not need to be in formal learning environments such as schools or professional development courses.

In order to illustrate my points above, the experience I would like to share involves teaching a unit on The Grapes of Wrath, by John Steinbeck.  When using the Backwards Assessment Model; first, I looked at the big picture and asked myself the following: What learning goals did I want to set for my students and what common core standards will I be able to align those goals to?  I find that sometimes this is the most difficult task even though I have been teaching for 14 years!  It is so valuable though because when my students ask, “Mrs. Mills, why are we reading this novel?”, I have an immediate answer because in the analysis of my material, I had to ask myself the exact same question; thus, I started with the end in mind.   One example of a goal or an enduring understanding for the unit (I had a total of four) was that I wanted my students to gain an awareness of the discrimination that existed between the Californians (specifically the farmers and the corporations) and the migrant workers in the events that followed The Dust Bowl.  I then aligned Common Core Standards, built in my assessments that were both formative and summative, and then planned my activities for the unit. I have this quote on my desk to remind me where to begin designing my units:  “To begin with the end in mind means to start with a clear understanding of your destination.  It means to know where you’re going so that you better understand where you are now so that the steps you take are always in the right direction.” (Covey, 1994)

3.  In your opinion, how does Instructional Design relate to Educational Technology?

I think that Instructional Design relates to Educational Technology because both facilitate learning and focus on improving performance.  In addition, both Instructional Design and Educational Technology provide teachers and learners with tools to conceptualize and communicate, use highly engaging methods, and provide for creative processing.

4. Share a short description of the topic you plan to work on for the required Instructional Design project in this course. 

  • The targeted learners-High School Juniors
  • The context of the instruction-Classroom
  • The topic of the instruction-After 1.5 hours of instruction, students will be able to create a 2-4 minute digital story.